Keith Pelley Says Haotong Li Penalty “Grossly Unfair”
The last couple of days in the golf world have been dominated by the penalty given to Haotong Li at the Omega Dubai Desert Classic.
Judged to have been lined up by his caddie, Li was penalised two strokes which shoved him from third place all the way down to a tie for 12th. As a result the penalty cost him around €100,000.
Fellow tour pros have rushed to the defence of the Chinese youngster, such as Eddie Pepperell, Matt Wallace and Pablo Larrazabal.
Hard to believe @haotong_li has been penalised for this. Frankly, I think it’s a shockingly bad decision and for the life of me I cannot see how Mike has lined Haotong up here 🤷🏼♂️. https://t.co/cJ4OZZbRKk
After 2 weeks of golf in the @EuropeanTour i toke one thing in clear… the @RandA and @usga have to check those new 2019 golf rules… my Chinese brother @haotong_li didnt deserve that penalty on the 72nd… the line is to thin… 🧐
Now European Tour CEO Keith Pelley has got involved giving his thoughts on the matter. In a statement he said;
“Let me state initially that, under the new Rules of Golf issues on January 1, 2019, the decision made by our referees was correct, under the strict wording of the rules. It is my strong belief, however, that the fact there is no discretion available to our referees when implementing rulings such as this is wrong and should be addressed immediately.
“Everyone I have spoken to about this believes, as I do, that there was no malice or intent from Li Haotong, nor did he gain any advantage from his, or his caddie’s split-second actions. Therefore the subsequent two-shot penalty, which moved him from T3 in the tournament to T12, was grossly unfair in my opinion.
“In an era where we are striving to improve all aspects of golf, we need to be careful and find the proper balance between maintaining the integrity of the game and promoting its global appeal.
“I have spoken personally to R&A Chief Executive Martin Slumbers to voice my opposition to the fact there is no discretion available to our referees in relation to this ruling, and I will be making additional representation to the R&A in the near future to discuss the matter further.”