It's a question that prompts polar-opposite responses from different golfers, but should we get free relief from fairway divots?
Should Golfers Get Free Relief From Divots?
This question often raises its head as many golfers feel it very unfair that you should hit a seemingly perfect drive, only to end up in a divot from a previous player’s shot.
If anyone had a right to feel aggrieved, it would be Marc Leishman. The Australian made it into a play-off for the 2015 Open at St Andrews only for his drive on the first play-off hole to end up in a fairway divot.
When the media pressed him on it, he acknowledged his disappointment. But then he pretty much brushed it off as part and parcel of the game:
“Yeah, drove it straight into a divot, which was pretty disappointing especially to that pin. You couldn’t see the bottom part of the ball.
“I didn’t really have much of a chance there and then three-putted from about 60 feet, which was disappointing. You can’t do anything about it. You’ve just got to try and deal with it and make a par and move on. Disappointed, but that’s the way golf goes.”
Wildly different opinions
People have polar-opposite views on the subject of fairway divots. Some rage at the unfairness of it all. Others are more philosophical and see it as an occupational hazard in a game played on a vast natural arena.
In a recent GM video about Rules that could or should be changed, most replies were in favour of free relief because of the unfairness of it all. But when the same question was posed on the Golf Monthly website forum, it was a different story. About 75% of the comments were along the lines of ‘no relief and just get on with it’.
We recently ran the topic as a debate in the magazine too, with me taking the ‘no’ side and my colleague, Fergus Bisset, pleading the case for free relief from divots…
Should You Get Free Relief From Fairway Divots?
says Jeremy Ellwood
Let me start by saying that I, like every golfer, feel understandably aggrieved when I arrive at a rare fairway-splitting drive to find part of the ball underground. It makes you want to weep!
So, how can I possibly argue against free relief from such a blatantly unfair break?
Well, there are plenty of other instances where the game seems inherently unfair. For example, the perfect shot that would have spun and stopped dead but instead hits the flagstick and rebounds into the water, as Tiger experienced in the 2013 Masters.
Perhaps more importantly though, how would you define a divot in the Rules so that everyone was applying the same yardstick? A deep gouge out of the fairway is obviously a divot. But what about a lighter scraping where the surface has been damaged but not very much?
At many clubs, you effectively get free relief from divots for nearly half the year anyway via winter rules. And finally, how often does it really happen? Personally, I can’t recall one such instance last year. In fact, I’m struggling to remember my last really bad break on this front.
says Fergus Bisset
Golf is a game where you have to take the rough with the smooth to succeed. Inevitably you face bad breaks almost every time you play. A cruel bounce, a bobble on the line of a putt, an unexpected gust of wind. And yes, on the flipside, the occasional bit of good fortune creeps in there too.
But having to play from divot holes in the fairway spins the dancing wheel of golfing chance too hard and fast. Striking a perfect shot and finding a near unplayable lie is totally unfair, not simply a bit of bad luck.
If you pipe one down the middle of a narrow fairway, you should reap the benefits. You shouldn’t walk up to find you’re in the centre-cut but two inches below the surface in a divot hole. If you do, you should be entitled to relief.
Okay, it’s often possible to play a shot from a divot hole, but the challenge is far greater than from nicely mown grass. And the steep angle of attack necessary to find the back of the ball brings that most dreaded possibility into the equation – a shank!
The Rules of golf are generally fair and reasonable, but no relief from a divot in the fairway is one I believe should change. Shots played into the correct place should never be punished to that extent.
You will have your own opinion, of course, but we can say from our many conversations with The R&A that there is little appetite to change the status quo on this.
This from a feature a few years ago with the then director of rules and equipment standards, David Rickman, and then chief executive, Peter Dawson…
Why is there no free relief from fairway divots?
David Rickman: It’s a fundamental principle that the ball is played as it lies. There are, of course, exceptions to this, but these are limited in number and restricted to circumstances where relief is considered appropriate and necessary: immovable obstructions, casual water [now temporary water], ground under repair – that sort of thing.
Course conditioning has improved considerably over the years and I think that has exacerbated matters for some who feel they have an entitlement to a perfect lie. But I think it’s a fundamental principle that you have to accept good and bad lies as part of the game.
Peter Dawson: And what is a divot? There would be a big debate – we’d just go on and on.
Indeed! You can argue that we all know what a divot is in general terms, but for the Rules of Golf, that’s not enough. We would need a definition that couldn’t be read different ways and wasn’t open to misinterpretation. Is such a definition possible? We remain unconvinced…