Greenpeace Takes Swipe At Golf, Hints Courses Could Be Put To 'Better' Use

The thorny issue of solar panels is currently in the news, with the UK’s environment secretary Ranil Jayawardena reportedly planning to ban solar farms on agricultural land, arguing that it hinders the government’s programme of growth boosting food production.

Not surprisingly, that suggestion hasn’t been well received by environmental organisation Greenpeace UK, who had the country’s golf courses in its sights in response. A message on its official Twitter account says: “Amount of land in the UK taken up by: Golf courses = 1,256 km2 Solar farms = 230 km2. If government ministers want to put our land to better use, why don't they take a look at golf courses first?”
 

The timing of Greenpeace’s tweet is unusual as it came just a day after the end of the inaugural Sustainable Golf Week, which highlighted achievements in sustainability and the eco-friendly initiatives carried out in the game. However, as well as celebrating the strides already made, it also asked how golf can be more sustainable and pinpointed what needs to be improved to deliver on the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

There are strong arguments that golf courses already play an important role in offering green spaces in urban areas, while they can also help protect coastal strips and provide vital buffers for wetlands. Meanwhile, a 2016 Financial Times article appeared to disprove claims that golf courses in the UK take up more land than housing.  Away from environmental arguments, golf is also enjoying a resurgence among the public in Britain, with research showing that 4.8m adults playing on either a nine or 18-hole course in 2021. Not only that, but there are health benefits of playing golf, suggesting its value goes beyond purely environmental issues.

Greenpeace’s tweet certainly inspired plenty of debate with well over 1,000 responses. However, with a compelling argument suggesting the positives of golf courses comfortably outweigh any potential negatives, it is doubtful as to whether its suggestion will be acted upon.